UNDPI.org

NGO information exchange

Sunday
Feb 12th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home arrow NGO news arrow Vietnam proposed sanctions defeated at ECOSOC
Vietnam proposed sanctions defeated at ECOSOC
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Sunday, 25 July 2004
Haiti_celebrate_president.jpg
New York 23 July, after a 2-year process, the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) voted on a recommendation to sanction the Transnational Radical Party. The recommendation was rejected by a vote of 22 against in 29 favor, 11 abstentions and one absent. Before the vote, the Council held a debate. The tone of the discussion was set by a statement delivered by the Permanent Representative of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, who, on behalf of the European Union, addressed one by one the Vietnamese accusations rejecting them procedurally and in their substance. Others speakers were Sierra Leone, who supported the TRP, Vietnam, which reaffirmed all the allegations produced over the last two years. Italy, in a strong statement delivered by Ambassador Spatafora emphasized how the TRP had not only respected all the relevant UN rules, but also that suspending the TRP would have gone against the spirit of the UN Charter. Cuba, China, Russia, Benin, Indonesia and the United States also participated in the debate. Role of the Italian Government that has been, as underlined by the President and Treasurer, active and positive.

On Monday 20, TRP President and Treasurer, Sergio Stanzani and Danilo Quinto, and former lista Bonino MEP Marco Cappato, held a press conference with dozens of Italian Parliamentarians that had signed an appeal to support the TRP at the UN. Communication Minister Maurizio Grasparri also addressed the event. On that same day, Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini issued a statement on the role of Italy throughout the entire process.

The vote at the ECOSOC ends a procedure that was triggered by Vietnam in 2002, a process that engaged the Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations and the TRP and that saw additional accusations presented by Vietnam in 2003 and that triggered four written responses by the TRP. On 21 May 2004, the Committee took a vote on a recommendation to suspend the consultative status of the TRP for three years. Vietnams request was formally introduced by China and supported by nine delegations: China, Ivory Coast, Cuba, Russian Federation, India, Iran, Pakistan, Sudan and Zimbabwe. Eight voted against: Cameroon, Chile, France, Germany, Peru, Romania, United States and Turkey. Colombia and Senegal abstained.

The latest days before the vote, had been characterized by additional Vietnamese accusations. In fact, On July 1, and 15, the Vietnamese Ambassador to the UN sent two letters and several attachments to all the members of the UN Economic and Social Council presenting new allegations against the TRP and Kok Ksor and announcing that, whatever the outcome of the ECOSOC deliberations, Vietnam would continue its campaign to exclude Mr. Ksor from the UN system. The Permanent Representative of the Kingdom of the Netherlands sent a 3-page letter to ECOSOC members countering one by one all the “new” Vietnamese accusations, requesting the Council to distribute the final response submitted by the TRP to the Committee as an official document.

Vietnams move came after the Committee, at the request of China, had voted not to allocate more time to the debate, as requested by Germany. In 2000, when a similar complaint against the TRP was brought to the attention of the ECOSOC, the Council decided to re-open a decision adopted by the Committee by a vote, in a scenario that resembled the one before the UN in 2004, but where the number of countries that voted in favor of the recommendation for a sanction was in fact larger.

On July 14th the TRP had launched an appeal to seek the support of individuals and organizations before the vote. Over 4000 people have signed the petition on-line, while the Australian Vietnam Human Rights Committee, Society for threatened peoples international, Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, Democracy Coalition Project, Council for a Community of Democracies, UN Watch, Amnesty International and the World Federalist Movement sent letters to ECOSOC members urging them to vote against the recommendation to suspend the TRP for three years.
 
< Prev   Next >

Poll

How often do you receive first hand information about the UN from your radio & TV stations?
 

Crisis watch

  • CrisisWatch N°102
    In Syria prospects of ending the crisis look bleak, with the UN Security Council struggling to agree on an appropriate response. The Assad regime?s brutal crackdown, including shelling of central city Homs, shows no sign...
  • CrisisWatch N°101
    In Iraq, the official withdrawal of the last U.S. combat troops, nearly nine years after the invasion, was quickly followed by a political crisis. Authorities issued an arrest warrant for the country?s top Sunni politician,...
  • CrisisWatch N°100
    The Democratic Republic of Congo?s presidential and parliamentary vote went ahead on 28-30 November, after a campaign marred by violence and amid allegations of rigging and mismanagement. Political rallies were banned in the wake of...
  • CrisisWatch N°99
    Deadly clashes between government forces and the insurgent Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) broke out in the troubled southern Philippines in October.
  • CrisisWatch N°98
    In Sudan a Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) offensive in Blue Nile state, and renewed clashes in Southern Kordofan between the SAF and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North, fuelled fears of a return to civil war.